Yesterday morning I was squarely in the Charlie Frye must start at quarterback for the Browns camp, but I've changed my mind... sort of. I'm ready to let rookie Brady Quinn start, IF the Browns can get something of value (a second-day draft pick in 2008 most likely) in return for Charlie. I'm not convinced Frye will take to being a back-up, which he eventually will be in Cleveland, so why not get something in return now when there is value? The problem with Frye, and Derek Anderson for that matter, is they've been given a chance to take the job and let a rookie, who hasn't been in camp two weeks, outplay them. The biggest concern with this plan is Quinn gets beat up like Tim Couch (or Frye for that matter). It's a calculated risk, I suppose, but one has to hope the Browns have spent enough money over the last two years on that offensive line that it will get its act together and protect a quarterback. Quinn (or any quarterback in the system) will have the added protection of Jamal Lewis in the backfield. Lewis may be a shadow of what he was a couple of years ago when he was piling up record yardage against the Browns, but he's still better than anything we've got (or had). So, if they can get something of value for Frye (and I've heard Minnesota, Kansas City and Atlanta) have all inquired about the availability of one of the Cleveland quarterbacks), I say do it, start Quinn and get on with the future once again.